[aprssig] how to implement 'No more relay' for dummies
aprs at kd4rdb.com
Tue Apr 5 13:39:23 CDT 2005
Suum cuique pulchrum est.
Phillip B. Pacier wrote:
> I am still not in agreement with this plan. I seriously do not think
> the number of dupes generated by RELAY packets is in any way a
> detriment to the system. I can say that with proof of how it is
> working in L.A., with the trap digi plan and a few digis supporting
> RELAY, we still cut traffic by almost 75% even while still supporting
> RELAY. It is easier to understand than WIDE1-1,WIDEn-N, and it is
> best in my opinion. I am 100% against implementing this and
> eliminating RELAY. I still plan to use RELAY and will be using it on
> some upcoming events with some new APRS folks as we set up a temporary
> digi in a canyon for some added coverage. They can set their path to
> RELAY,WIDE2-2 and understand what is going to happen. To implement
> this as a blanket nationwide change is a BAD idea.
> Phil - AD6NH
> Robert Bruninga wrote:
>>>>> ramirault at erols.com 4/5/05 1:37:20 PM >>>
>>> How do we reach the (many) folks who don't read this list?
>> An APRS bulleting works nicely. I use one something like this:
>> BLN1: RELAY & WIDE are obsolete & being removed.
>> BLN2: Google for web page 'fix14439.html' for info
>> Everyone can help educate GOOGLE to find my page by
>> clicking here:
>> aprssig mailing list
>> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig