[aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Apr 7 12:45:29 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS in the National Parks...
- Next message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> kf6hjo at earthlink.net 4/5/05 7:02:40 PM >>> >So with the [ultimate] deletion of RELAY and WIDE... >When an outsider enters our National Parks that now >have DIGI's in the area, [and he didn't get the word about >the change], Should we leave RELAY and WIDE >on in these areas? Yes, there is no harm done in keeping the RELAY alias for a reasonable transition period. But most digis already fully support the WIDE1-1, so users may begin using the WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 path as soon as they get around to it. If there is an area that is only supported by a fill-in digi only, then it can have the dual aliases for the transition period, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS in the National Parks...
- Next message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
