[aprssig] Simplified New n-N for Users
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Apr 7 13:03:29 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Next message: [aprssig] UIDIGI and the New Paradigm - WARNING - LONG!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> ve7gdh at rac.ca 4/6/05 10:41:27 PM >>> >.. the digipeater...[had] 2400 beacons in a 24 hour period >to RELAY,WIDE2-2,... another nearby digi ... going out to >WIDE5-5. [which won't] be changed any time soon... Yes, these are the kinds of problems we are trying to solve with the New n-N Paradigm. The W5-5 beacons from that one digi in the remote location might be easy to fix at adjacent digis. Just have those adjacent digis TRAP the WIDE5-5 (like they are supposed to do under the New n-N Paradigm) and the problem is solved without a trip to the 5-5 site. And if the surrounding digis cannot TRAP 5-5, then the next tier out can add 5-4 to their trapping list until someone gets to the original site to change its beacon path and rate... That was the main advantage and goal of the New n-N Paradigm, was to give digi sysops the tools to manage their local area, without having to be completely dependent on user education and begging the users to fix their paths. godd lulck Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Next message: [aprssig] UIDIGI and the New Paradigm - WARNING - LONG!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
