[aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
William McKeehan mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.netThu Apr 7 13:09:26 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Next message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Not been paying attention, have you...well WIDE1-1 will be added as an alias to existing RELAY only DIGI's (digi's that do not support WIDEn-N). SO, the initial WIDE1-1 is needed if you need a RELAY to get your packet to a big digi (one that suppports WIDEn-N) BUT then, if you only need one hop from there, you don't want to use WIDE1-1 again because the other RELAY stations in the area would catch the second WIDE1-1 and digi it, thus causing lots of little packets PLUS the big packet from the big digi. Clear as mud? At least that's how I understand it. On Thu, April 7, 2005 8:55 am, Jason Winningham said: > > On Apr 7, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Robert Bruninga wrote: > >> But most digis already fully support the WIDE1-1, > > If most digis already support WIDE1-1, why don't we skip the > WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 step and go directly to WIDE2-2? > > And why WIDE2-1 instead of a second WIDE1-1? > > -Jason > kg4wsv > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > -- William McKeehan KI4HDU Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net http://mckeehan.homeip.net
- Previous message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Next message: [aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
