[aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks

[Robert Bruninga]

Yes

>>> mgermino at sbcglobal.net 4/7/05 11:41:42 AM >>>

>
> Because when using the 2 hop path of WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1
> the first hop has already been accounted for so the second
> hop should already be decremented by one.

Just to fully understand this... If your path is WIDE1-1,WIDE3-1
you would create the same number of packets as the example above.

Also, if all heck breaks loose and in an emergency your nearest I-gates
are 
5 hops away and you need to make it there. (EMERGENCY)  A path of
WIDE6-5 
would still work in this new APRS environment we are looking at. 
Correct?

Mike
AD6AA



_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org 
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig