[aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks
bruninga at usna.edu
Thu Apr 7 10:52:29 CDT 2005
>>> mgermino at sbcglobal.net 4/7/05 11:41:42 AM >>>
> Because when using the 2 hop path of WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1
> the first hop has already been accounted for so the second
> hop should already be decremented by one.
Just to fully understand this... If your path is WIDE1-1,WIDE3-1
you would create the same number of packets as the example above.
Also, if all heck breaks loose and in an emergency your nearest I-gates
5 hops away and you need to make it there. (EMERGENCY) A path of
would still work in this new APRS environment we are looking at.
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig