[aprssig] Broadcasting?
Tad Burnett tburnett at vermontel.netWed Aug 3 01:57:07 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Broadcasting?
- Next message: [aprssig] Broadcasting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Seeing as there were no deaths....Kind of like yelling fire in a theater when there is no fire.... Tad N1QAG A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) wrote: > Shortly after the Air France crash today, a station sent out an APRS > message addressed to "ALL" that said (paraphrasing from memory) "Air > France crash in Toronto, 200 feared dead". While I thought this was > an interesting thing to know, it had me wondering if the message was > breaking the rules. > > If you brought up the local repeater and just blurted out the same > type of "breaking news" message intended for anyone listening, I think > it would be considered broadcasting. It definitely was not a message > that would be "of interest to the Amateur community only" which is > supposed to be one of the broadcasting litmus tests. On the other > hand, unlike a analog voice transmission on a repeater, the average > "non-Ham" would not be able to receive an APRS message, so I can see > this argument going either way... > > What are your opinions on this? > > Thanks! > > A.J. Farmer, AJ3U > http://www.aj3u.com > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20050802/74435962/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] Broadcasting?
- Next message: [aprssig] Broadcasting?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
