[aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comThu Aug 18 03:44:46 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 17, 2005, at 11:30 PM, James Washer wrote: > I think your filter misses a lot of errors... > > Can you tell me what it does look for? Does it validate the DTI? > Depends what you call an error, I think it catches most of the errors in APRS format packets. I specifically do not check for things like the present thread. Not everything that gets to findU is APRS...these beacons are common in systems packet other than APRS. There are other kinds of non-APRS things that appear on the APRS IS, I make no attempt to flag them. What the error page displays is errors in parsing packets that have specific APRS meanings in the spec...for example a position report missing N or S in the latitude field, or a two digit temp in weather packets. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
