[aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
James Washer washer at trlp.comThu Aug 18 15:50:49 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Never mind.. I see Section 19 says "Packets that do not meet any of the formats described in the document are assumed to be non-APRS beacons"... I'll just ignore them in my "APRS packet tester" - jim KG7HH On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:40:41 -0700 James Washer <washer at trlp.com> wrote: > > What do you mean by a "BEACON packet below? > > On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:11:05 -0400 > Steve Dimse <steve at dimse.com> wrote: > > > If someone sends some other sort of non-APRS packet, like a BEACON > > packet, that is simply ignored by findU. > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
