[aprssig] Re: ALTNETS WAS: Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf2 at aol.comThu Aug 18 19:57:18 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier justrandomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
henk.de.groot at hetnet.nl wrote: > . > Also keep in mind that MIC-E packets also do not use AP* destinations, > but are not ALTNET packets. In fact.. you cannot use MIC-E on ALTNETs > since there is no way to indicate the ALTNET... > Interesting. Never thought about that.. Does this mean it's impossible to use the Kenwoods on ALTNETs (since they use Mic-E exclusively for posits)? If so, the ALTNET concept is inaccessable by a major portion of the APRS user base............ Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf (at) aol.com EchoLink Node: 14400 [Think bottom of the 2M band] Home Page: http://wa8lmf.com APRS Symbol Chart http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/miscinfo/APRS_Symbol_Chart.pdf New/Updated "Rev G" APRS http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs Symbols Set for UI-View, UIpoint and APRSplus:
- Previous message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier just randomly ignored? Should it be?
- Next message: [aprssig] Is the APRS Spec for APRS Data Type Identifier justrandomly ignored? Should it be?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
