[aprssig] Off Topic: Top Posting

[Gary V. Smith]

Cope!

At 10:39 AM 8/19/2005, you wrote:
>Again, I'd have to disagree.  The "professional" lists that I am 
>associated with do not post below.  They usually post within or on 
>top.  It is just easier for those of us that follow the posts.
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org on behalf of Doug Ferrell
>Sent: Fri 19-Aug-05 10:35
>To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
>Subject: RE: [aprssig] Off Topic: Top Posting
>
>
>
>On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Daron J. Wilson wrote:
>
> > FWIW, I prefer to respond directly to the portion of text that my response
> > matches while deleting the extraneous text that is not relative to the
> > discussion.  As in this thread, I failed to take the time to even read to
> > the bottom of all the repeater forwards for the 'original' concern, and 
> used
> > the > to indicate a previously posted text, and pushed the response there.
>
>    Great Example Daron!  Quote a paragraph (or part of it), respond, then
>quote more if you have to and your response below it. As you can see, this
>message is alot easier to read since you can tell what I am replying
>about.
>
>   I guess I am a membmer of so many "professional" list (many linux
>developers list) and top posters will learn "real quick"! [GRIN]
>
>
>
>--
>
>...DOUG, KD4MOJ
>http://www.kd4moj.org
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig