[aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comThu Aug 25 22:13:54 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Next message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 25, 2005, at 4:22 PM, A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) wrote: > Here is a very interesting site I stumbled upon: > > http://www.mountainlake.k12.mn.us/ham/aprs/ > There is a serious problem with using the APRS Internet System data for this purpose. The APRS IS was designed to move the data payloads, not the path information. Duplicate packets are filtered, which make ANY interpretation tricky, but in my opinion this site makes claims the data cannot support. Just as an example, the page you mention http://www.mountainlake.k12.mn.us/ham/aprs/path.cgi?call=AJ3U-5 is not really "Stations Received By AJ3U-5". Rather, it is those stations sending packets received by AJ3U-5 which got to this web site before those received via other IGates. There may be many others received in this time frame that do not appear on the list. Many, if not most, interesting propagation events will be lost because of this filtering. Path modifications by digipeaters may place stations here not actually heard, though in the example I do not see any. The site calculates hop distances between callsigns listed in the path...however, unless everyone runs trace, callsigns are not added or are dropped from the path in routine digipeater operation, so a packet may have traveled through multiple digis between the two identifiable endpoints. The site depends on manual removal of HF stations from the analysis. Manual filtering will miss some HF stations containing bad data, and filter some good data. Stations transmitting on both HF an VHF are particularly problematic. My analysis of the problems with this interpretation of the data is based on sketchy details on the web site, and some of the points I make may be wrong in a specific detail, there is no question that the raw data on the APRS IS simply does not contain the information needed to produce the output this web site contains. The charts are pretty though! If you want to see propagation studies done right with modified APRS tools, see http://w2ev.rochesterny.org/PropNET/ Ev has created a separate internet hub without filtering designed explicitly for propagation studies. Furthermore, the system primarily uses PSK31, resulting in a greater sensitivity to propagation events. It supports many bands, though almost all activity is 10 meters at this time. findU has separate support for PropNET, here are the paths observed in the last day http://propnet.findu.com/catch.cgi?last=24 There are animated GIFs for the last day and last week created each night http://propnet.findu.com/yesterday.gif http://propnet.findu.com/lastweek.gif PropNET was a lot more work than the harvesting APRS IS data, and because effort is required from each of the participating stations, fewer people participate and PropNET produces much less data, but the data it does returns has real meaning. I'd encourage anyone interested in propagation to join Ev's effort, all he needs is more stations and this will become a serious tool. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Next message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
