[aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) farmer.aj at gmail.comFri Aug 26 13:21:21 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Next message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/26/05, Steve Dimse <steve at dimse.com> wrote: >In particular, the rare propagation event, meteor scatter, >Es, or whatever, is very likely to be missed. The site may be presented as a propogation prediction site, but I agree with you that PropNET is a much better tool for that job. My main interest was in the site's ability to show, even if not absolutely 100% accurate, the stations heard direct by another station. To me, that is a very useful tool in determining the state of the APRS network in a certain area. > The net effect is that no payload data is filtered, one copy always > gets through, but a LOT of path information is filtered. This > filtering is essential, the APRS IS would need to carry perhaps 10 > times as much data were it not done. I think I get it now. The APRS-IS server that an IGate connects to (or perhaps a tier 1 server up the chain) does the filtering based on what it has already seen? I didn't realize any filtering was done at that level. I understand that filtering happens as you described it, I was just under the impression that it is done a little "further up the chain". I thought if you connected to what I would consider the raw feed at a Tier 1 server, then you would see everything coming in, totally unfiltered, which would allow this website to work as described. Where does the filtering occur?
- Previous message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Next message: [aprssig] Realtime VHF Propogation using APRS-IS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
