cap at cruzio.com
Sat Aug 27 11:29:03 CDT 2005
I think Earl's problem direction is ESE to Lubbock, TX.
But even most of the updated Kantronics digis won't handle the second hop of
that "fill-in SSn" path properly, although they will handle the second hops
of the "fill-in WIDEn-N" properly. So, better than NM1-1,NM7-7 would be
plain NM7-7. <grin>
Fixed non-moving: WIDE2-2
Mobile, moving: WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1
Blanket N.Mexico: NM4-4
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Bill WA7NWP
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 00:01 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Finito
> > I've been trying for YEARS to explain that the same solution
> > won't work for the entire country and every time I do, you people skip
> Maybe you're missing half the solution of the new paradigm?
> WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 will work "ok" every where and won't hurt anywhere.
> That's the lowest common path that makes for an acceptable standard.
> For your area with it's low population, why not have all the regular
> users running NM1-1,NM7-7 and cover the state?
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig