[aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
Jason Winningham jdw at eng.uah.eduSun Aug 28 23:08:12 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
- Next message: [aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
My understanding of the NewN-N paradigm is that the state/regional prefix (e.g. FLn-n) was designed specifically _not_ to be limited for the very reason you're talking about. If FLn-n is being limited, somebody missed the point. If weather info is such a critical use of your network, perhaps a separate network is in order? > I used to enjoy seeing 150 to 250 stations coming in > on RF APRS each day here in Central Florida. Yes, the single > 1200 baud APRS channel IS sufficient to accomplish this. Maybe, but if those 150 to 250 stations are transmitting very often, your network is dropping a _lot_ of packets. I suspect there is very little reliability in such a network. I certainly wouldn't want to depend on it for critical weather info. Does NWS distribute alerts via RF in some data format? -Jason kg4wsv
- Previous message: [aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
- Next message: [aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
