[aprssig] Path Confusion and old TNC's

[A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)]

On 8/31/05, Patrick Green <pagreen at gmail.com> wrote:
> This sounds like the NSR argument.  

NSR would be a long term solution indeed, but I'm referring to the
network as it is today and the near future.

> WIDE2-2 alone isn't enough in Chicago. 
> There would be major holes in coverage unfortunately. 

Okay, then perhaps WIDE3-3?

My point is there is a need for a standard universal path.