[aprssig] 9600 baud capable radios
John Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.comWed Feb 2 20:31:35 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] 9600 baud capable radios
- Next message: [aprssig] 9600 baud capable radios
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralph Milnes wrote: > George says the V7A and D700 are OK. Henk do you agree with that? > > George says V7A and D700 do need a good signal path, and Gerhard points out > that the minimum TXDs on the V7A and D700 are relatively high and thus > reduce the overall effectiveness of quick 9600 exchanges.. so they are not > ideal for a 9600 baud network (for example at the node). > > But I want to confirm whether or not the V7A and D700 (and the D7A?) will > still function at 9600 as advertised. The answer will be useful for users > who are trying to use these Kenwood radios for "simple" communication on a > 9600 network. A few years ago I did a frequency response test of the V7A, and the results were bad on 1200, OK on 9600 TX, and marginal on 9600 RX. See http://www.febo.com/packet/layer-one/kenwood-tmv7a.html for details. Note that I didn't test turnaround time or other factors that would influence throughput. 73, John
- Previous message: [aprssig] 9600 baud capable radios
- Next message: [aprssig] 9600 baud capable radios
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
