[aprssig] New WIDEn-N Paradigm (MAJOR MOD)
bruninga at usna.edu
Sun Feb 6 11:08:24 CST 2005
What you are missing is that we want ALL digipeaters to
capture and stop at least WIDE5-5, 6-6, 7-7, and then
there is no where that the packets can get into the system,
therefore you wont get any 7-3's into your area either.
Its a big plan. But each digi that switches over, helps out
ALL digis around it... And eventually the network is better.
>>> Wes Johnston <aprs at kd4rdb.com> 2/6/05 8:28:10 AM >>>
I know your recommendations are always grounded in pracitcality. But
TNC manu's come out with firmware that lets us limit UIFLOOD or UITRACE
count (ie only digipeat UIFLOOD < 2-2), this solution is hokey at
The 3rd recommendation below defies belief... (the others too, but I'm
pick on number 3)
1- RELAY, WIDE5-5, WIDE6-6, WIDE7-7 in wilderness areas
2- RELAY, WIDE4-4, WIDE5-5, WIDE6-6 in rural areas more than 3 hops
3- RELAY, WIDE3-3, WIDE4-4, WIDE5-5 in populated areas where even 3-3
4- RELAY, WIDE2-2, WIDE2-1, WIDE3-3 with UIFLOOD and UITRACE OFF in
Density local area
I understand that UIDIGI settings take precedence over UIFLOOD
settings. So you
can put a callsign in there with the SSID such as WIDE5-5... and when a
is heard he'd be digipeated using the UIDIGI setting and get one hop
more. But this still does nothing to stop the WIDE5-4 that my
just repeated. Or the WIDE7-3 that my neighbor just digipeated that
350 miles away. I still end up with my local lan flooded with the lids
>200 miles away! In order for this plan to work, every digi has to
WIDE7-7 or WIDE5-5 on the first hop. And if the first digi to hear
doesn't "gobble it up" with a digipeat under the UIDIGI rules (ie
decrement N and does set the HID flag), then that packet becomes
I can't filter out. There are too many permutations - we're limited to
the UIDIGI setting.
The whole point for me to switching away from WIDEn-n was to segment
becuase we _didn't_ have a way to filter packets based on the value of
realize that the SSn-n is still recommended, but I just can't see
WIDEn-n anymore. My network is working better than ever since the
If we start digipeating WIDEn-n here, even with the suggested settings,
end up seeing as much traffic as we used to as the WIDE7-7's and
rolling in at various stages of 7-6,7-5,7-4,7-3,7-2 or 5-4,5-3,5-2,5-1.
saw any WIDE7-7's locally. I never saw any WIDE5-5's locally... they
WIDE7-1 or 7-3... how would I stop them? Ideally, the digipeaters in
catch these packets under the UIDIGI setting, but practically speaking,
will not have setup their digipeaters to catch them, and will allow
network cluttering packets to propagate outward as WIDEn-n's.
FWIW, the local digi for me is KC4PL and he runs javaaprs which
limits. It counts all hops in a packet (ie RELAY,WIDE counts as 2
RELAY,WIDE5-5 counts as 6 hops) and will not digipeat any packet with
hops(here, x is set for 3 hops). They don't even get one hop.... They
IGATED, but do not propagate on RF. So a trucker passing thru running
gets to the internet as he obviously is trying to do, but does not
I do really like the idea of giving the WIDE7-7's one hop... so they
the digi as WIDE7-7*. This is so much better than budlisting the guy
when he isn't digipeated, he'll get angry and up his RF power and get
creative with his paths.
Quoting Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu>:
> After a lot of debate over the last 2 months we have again
> modified the plan for the New n-N Paradigm to an even better
> and simpler design. See the web page:
> WIDEn-N works everywhere, but large N's are traped
> depending on the area.
> WIDE2-2 is guaranteed to work everywhere
> SSn-N is also supported for area use
> ##LNKn-N interstate idea is abandoned
> Secondary effects:
> TRACE and TRACEn-N are not supported
> WIDEn-N replaces it and is Traceable everywhere
> RELAY,WIDE and WIDE,WIDE are no longer desired
> WIDE may eventually be dropped if this all works.
> All digis will include a list of what they support
> in a consistent manner in the Position Text that
> will show up well on mobiles.
> This plan even works in the highest density system
> in the USA in the Los Angeles Basin and a test of it
> was initiated there last week.
> I have not completely re-editied all of my old WEB
> pages to reflect all thse changes, so if you find
> conflicts, then point me to them so I can fix them. But
> in general, the above plan is what is currently on the
> Bob, Wb4APR
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig