[aprssig] Abusive path lists
Robbie - WA9INF mwrobertson at comcast.netWed Feb 9 17:14:12 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Abusive path lists
- Next message: [aprssig] Abusive path lists
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob, What I would ask, along this line, is where are the I-Gates. If there are I-Gates all along the major highways and are reachable in 2, 3, or 4 hops, then true, truckers would not need 5-5. Or any traveler for that matter. In My cross country traveling, I would say, once out of the metro areas, you can drive for 100's of miles and there is no I-Gates. There area really desolate areas yet. I would suggest that we try to fill these areas and give the traveler a better reason not to use the extra long paths when they know better right now. When they do contact their families and find that they lost them a few days ago, the traveler has a tendency to boost the power and increase their hops. It is human nature, right? Just a thought, not to provide a solution before asking them to intentionally remove them from the IS isn't right... IMHO Robbie Robert Bruninga wrote: >>>>kb4ytm at charter.net 2/9/05 9:49:13 AM >>> >> >>So far, i have only seen 1 7-7 and he is over in Arkansas. >>Others are 5-5's mostly. > > > I notice that most long-haul truckers use 5-5. > Is that really required? I'm thinking that we should at > least encourage no more than 4-4 even out west > in the wide open spaces? Or is 5-5 really needed? > > Bob > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Abusive path lists
- Next message: [aprssig] Abusive path lists
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
