[aprssig] Abusive path lists
n0nhj at acsol.net
Wed Feb 9 11:25:51 CST 2005
I think we've started to fill in the couple of 'open' spaces where there were digi's but no Igates, along I-70.
I haven't seen anywhere in the Colorado / Utah / Arizona area where 3-3 won't get them to a Igate.
(other than a small area of colorado that has non WideN-n digis and needs wide,wide - we're working on that)
5-5 is way over doing it, and doesn't work in the problem area anyway.
Until November 2004 there was a hole in western colorado/eastern utah where it often took 5-5 to get to an Igate, but
with the addition of a Grand Junction Igate, that has been resolved.
Chuck Kimball n0nhj
Glenwood Springs, CO
Robert Bruninga wrote:
>>>>kb4ytm at charter.net 2/9/05 9:49:13 AM >>>
>>So far, i have only seen 1 7-7 and he is over in Arkansas.
>>Others are 5-5's mostly.
> I notice that most long-haul truckers use 5-5.
> Is that really required? I'm thinking that we should at
> least encourage no more than 4-4 even out west
> in the wide open spaces? Or is 5-5 really needed?
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
More information about the aprssig