[aprssig] Abusive path lists

[Chuck Kimball]

I think we've started to fill in the couple of 'open' spaces where there were digi's but no Igates, along I-70.

I haven't seen anywhere in the Colorado / Utah / Arizona area where 3-3 won't get them to a Igate.
(other than a small area of colorado that has non WideN-n digis and needs wide,wide - we're working on that)
5-5 is way over doing it, and doesn't work in the problem area anyway.

Until November 2004 there was a hole in western colorado/eastern utah where it often took 5-5 to get to an Igate, but 
with the addition of a Grand Junction Igate, that has been resolved.

Chuck Kimball  n0nhj
Glenwood Springs, CO



Robert Bruninga wrote:

>>>>kb4ytm at charter.net 2/9/05 9:49:13 AM >>>
>>
>>So far, i have only seen 1 7-7 and he is over in Arkansas. 
>>Others are 5-5's mostly. 
> 
> 
> I notice that most long-haul truckers use 5-5.
> Is that really required?  I'm thinking that we should at
> least encourage no more than 4-4 even out west
> in the wide open spaces?  Or is 5-5 really needed?
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>