[aprssig] NCn-N Stuff
John Johnson Ke4tzn at cox.netSat Feb 12 01:35:04 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Next message: [aprssig] APRSp*m?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I like what I have seen but I thought the whole purpose for this change was to improve the network and get away from the WIDEn-N. The best solution is education. If you see someone running a bad path contact them and explain how it hurts the network. Leave the wide and relay in place a universal path for those people who travel but use only a 2hop path EX. (WIDE.WIDE or RELAY, WIDE). Again educate the user. Filtering out long paths is only a simple fix for uneducated users, AGAIN education is the best. Approach it in a nice calm manner and most people will change. It’s just a challenge to keep going to digi owners and say Woops we need to change again. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20050211/e37d6751/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Next message: [aprssig] APRSp*m?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
