[aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
Robbie - WA9INF mwrobertson at comcast.netSat Feb 12 03:44:58 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Next message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob, Since all this started, I think you also should advocate that we stay with the International recognition of RELAY,WIDE2-2 or RELAY,WIDE3-3 for travelers. It still seems up in the air and it should be plainly stated in your documentations. I think there is as much of a need for mobiles as well as trvelers across the country to utilize APRS as it is for homes. RELAY,WIDE2-2 if near metros, and RELAY,WIDE3-3 out in the open. Even if the mobiles are fixed paths not easily changed, and they are just passing through, why can not the RELAY,WIDE3-3 be tolerated for a few minutes? This needs to be stated and recommended and be clear... Robbie Robert Bruninga wrote: >>>>wb4iuy at teara.org 2/11/05 8:34:38 PM >>> >> >>APRS folks. I sincerely hope the dust settles and a great protocol > > arises... > > My appoligies for leading this New n-N Paradigm discussion > all around the horn and back... but it was a rewarding > trip and a lot was learned! It did bounce around for a while > as we got feedback from people on the sig and learned > more and better ways to do things. > > I think everyone will find that this new plan that lets WIDEn-N > work everywhere and phases out W,W and W,W,W paths > will really work well. Especially since we found out how to > fake the old TRACE digis to even support WIDE2-2 and > WIDE3-3 for at least local use.. > > Hang in there. Its just some growing pains... > > The dust has settled on this new plan and I hope it will > take hold everywhere. > > de WB4APR, Bob >
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Next message: [aprssig] New n-N success in NC (really??)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
