[aprssig] New n-N success in North Carolina
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSun Feb 13 17:37:38 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in North Carolina
- Next message: [aprssig] New n-N success in North Carolina
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> henk.de.groot at hetnet.nl 2/13/05 11:54:13 AM >>> >How long will it take before this ego finds out that >can just as well set the path to WA0EGO>APRS,WIDE7-6? There are thousands of ways that abusive operators can JAM and generally use their RF to mess up everyone around them. But the problem in APRS is not "intentional abuse" THe problem is lack of users understanding of what is good and what is bad for everyone. Therfore the whole objective is not to find ways to solve every problem, but to solvethe MAIN problem which is too much wrong and confusing guidance and lack of simple user guidance. By getting rid of RELAY, WIDE, TRACE, TRACEn-N and SS paths and going to a single recommendation: "USE WIDEn-N with N being appropriate for your area (2 or 3 in most areas) " Then we have a "rule to live by" that eveyone can get on the same page and HAMradio can do what it does best, help each other communicate well... Bob, Wb4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] New n-N success in North Carolina
- Next message: [aprssig] New n-N success in North Carolina
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
