[aprssig] Bob, Address the WIDE7-6 Possibility
HamLists at ametx.com
Tue Feb 22 08:40:42 CST 2005
I used RELAY,WIDE2-2 from Dallas to NE Iowa last fall and had full
world-wide coverage except where there wasn't a digipeater at all so
path wouldn't have made a difference there anyway. PLEASE DON'T use
WIDE4-4 or WIDE3-3 in Texas or the surrounding areas, ESPECIALLY not in
the Dallas-Ft. Worth metro area (highest density according to Bob's
maps). RELAY,WIDE (yes we have some holes that WIDEn-n don't cover
well) or WIDE (doesn't cause dupes) for local DFW area paths, please.
If you want to fix the problem and not just apply a bandaid which will
eventually break, get rid of source routing entirely.
Pete Loveall AE5PL
mailto:pete at ae5pl.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bruninga
> Posted At: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 8:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Bob, Address the WIDE7-6 Possibility
> Yes, now that we have a complete map of the user density all
> over the USA, I see no problems with truckers using WIDE4-4
> everywhere west of the Mississippi except for the metro areas
> of Calif, Seattle, Denver
> and WIDE3-3 east of the Mississippi excet for the northeast
> and Chicago, Atlanta and Tampa, etc..
> Local travlers wouild use one less probably just to cut down
> on QRM most of the time...
More information about the aprssig