[aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
Noel Shrum ar798 at tcnet.orgWed Feb 23 23:01:27 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Next message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sean Jewett wrote: > I'm sorry, but relying on Microsoft based products is getting for what you > asked for. I know some people have wonderful uptimes with their Microsoft > systems, in particular running UIView. However, those are few and far > between. I have deployed several linux based floppies running aprsd and > have yet to have any of the failures you speak of. I myself run a Linux based igate. I'd NEVER run something as unreliable as windows (any version) for something important like packet radio. I can't see how the winlink people think that windows is good enough for emergency coms. I don't want to bet my life (or some one else) on Little Billy's OS. Even though I run APRSd on my Linux server, I still run the TNC (KPC3+) so that it is doing all the RF work. All my computer does is play igate. Noel
- Previous message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Next message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
