[aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) ajfarmer at spenet.comThu Feb 24 04:16:52 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Next message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I agree with you on the reliablity of Linux, however, I have been running an IGate using UI-View on Windows XP for a couple of years with no problem. The key is that I have this system dedicated to running UI-View and nothing else. I have disabled all of the unneeded services and otherwise "minimized" the system to be dedicated to the task. Having said all that, I still plan to convert it to APRSd as soon as time permits. ;-) LOL 73! A.J. Farmer, AJ3U http://www.aj3u.com -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Scott Miller Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 6:30 PM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject) > I myself run a Linux based igate. I'd NEVER run something as unreliable > as windows (any version) for something important like packet radio. > I can't see how the winlink people think that windows is good enough for > emergency coms. I don't want to bet my life (or some one else) on > Little Billy's OS. > > Even though I run APRSd on my Linux server, I still run the TNC (KPC3+) > so that it is doing all the RF work. All my computer does is play igate. I run APRSd on Linux with a KPC3 (non-plus). I'd have to say that Windows NT or 2000 would probably be just fine, if anyone would write packet software as a service, divorced from all the GUI components of the OS, rather than as a desktop application. In the same rack as the Linux box, I've got a Windows 2000 server that's been chugging along as long as the Linux box, running Oracle, some web services, and occasionally an APRS IS listener service. The Linux server's downtime has only been less because of software patches - Linux is a lot better about letting you apply patches without rebooting. Of course, the best thing about running Linux for services is that you can easily pare down the system to the bare minimum you need. Windows gives you a lot of stuff whether you want it or not. And Linux isn't perfect - I wouldn't be comfortable connecting a couple of Linux boxes to my external RAID array and running high-availability clustering yet. That's what I've got OpenVMS for. =] Scott N1VG _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Next message: [aprssig] Smart TNC's vs. KISS and computers was (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
