[aprssig] APRStest.EXE Test Data
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduThu Feb 24 20:21:31 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] software question
- Next message: [aprssig] software question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks like you have good users typically using mostly 2 and 3 hop paths. No real abuse. But the efficiencies are way down. Your area could double capacity and reliability by encouragnig evyerone to use WIDE2-2 or WIDE3-3 paths.. which would significantly reduce dupes... Bob >>> mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net 2/24/05 2:39:19 PM >>> Here are the results for packets heard at my station which is just east of Knoxville, TN for a 24 hour period yesterday. These numbers may change with digi hardware changes; the big digi's in the area currently use MFJ-1270c TNCs and only support WIDE, not WIDEn-N. In file: tnc.log Processing by APRSTEST.EXE ver 1.01 There were 3160 packets and 109 Users. Of those 1 % of packets were TCPIP User Path: WIDE1-N WIDE2-N WIDE3-N WIDE4-N ---------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Pct Users: 0 1 12 0 Pct Pckts: 0 0 1 8 Efficiency: 0 There were 1 % TNn-N users with 2 % of packets with a relative 2 efficiency. User Path: W W,W W,W,W W,W,W,W ---------- --- ---- ----- ------- Pct Users: 8 43 35 2 Pct Pckts: 16 25 43 1 Efficiency: 1 5 2 -- William McKeehan KI4HDU Internet: mckeehan at mckeehan.homeip.net http://mckeehan.homeip.net _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] software question
- Next message: [aprssig] software question
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
