[aprssig] 9600? Faster?
Andre PE1RDW aprs at pe1rdw.demon.nlThu Jul 7 16:45:35 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] 9600? Faster?
- Next message: [aprssig] 9600? Faster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Scott Miller schreef: > Would there be any improvement from running at 4800 baud? It's still > 4 times faster than the existing system, and shouldn't push the > envelope as much as far as the radios are concerned. That's plenty of > extra capacity for robust FEC. > > Scott > N1VG some time back I sugested a two level system, 1200 baud on 2 meter primary for trackers and 9600 baud on 70cm for all other trafic, all trafic from 2 meter gets gated to 70cm but only trafic intended for 2m gets gated from 70cm, a bit like the gate alias as used on 30 meters. I think that will give you the best of both worlds, easy to do with software digis, it might also be doable on a microprocesor controler hooking a few kiss tncs together. 73 de Andre PE1RDW
- Previous message: [aprssig] 9600? Faster?
- Next message: [aprssig] 9600? Faster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
