[aprssig] RE: indoor tracking.
Dixon, Tim tdixon at anteon.comWed Jun 1 20:28:39 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] K5FTW-5 Digi Changes
- Next message: [aprssig] K5FTW-5 Digi Changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maybe I'm missing it, but I thought we could program RFID devices with whatever output we would like (provided we have the proper equipment to program RFID tags, of course). So, someone's earlier suggestion that we simply have each tag respond with a positionless APRS string was an easy implementation. Or did I miss something along the way? /tim KG4MIQ By the way, I program RFID tags on a daily basis here at work. <Bob wrote> 3) We need the HUGE code space so that we can MAP our callsigns to the built-in codes. with a single reproducible algorithm. THe way I see it, for ARRL calls, the code space has to be A,N,K,W for the first letter (4) then 4 characters of 26 possibilities then one character of 10 possible numerals and one digit of 3 possiblities to tell where to put the numeric. This would require a 54 million code space, or about 8 digit numbers. But doing it this way we dont need to manage a 600,000 list of callsigns and mapped numbers. We compute the call directly from the number. <end quote>
- Previous message: [aprssig] K5FTW-5 Digi Changes
- Next message: [aprssig] K5FTW-5 Digi Changes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
