TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgThu Jun 2 20:07:16 UTC 2005
- Previous message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Next message: [aprssig] proximity detection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>From Fox News today: The bulky "Big Eyes" binoculars have long been aboard military ships so crew members can see points about five miles away. But a company called Torrey Pines Logic has designed an infrared attachment to allow soldiers looking through them to communicate with each other, since the Navy doesn't use radio. And here I was wondering why the PCSAT ground station involved giant semaphore flags... Scott N1VG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu> To: <jdw at eng.uah.edu>; <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:01 PM Subject: Re: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us! > >but between the increased load from growth of >>APRS and the abuses both ignorant and malicious of >>large values of n, TRACEn-n support is going >>away, as is support for large values of n for WIDEn-n. > > But under this New-N system, ALL paths using WIDEn-N > will be fully traced. Thus we will have a network that > can be analyzed perfectly. No, it is harder to trace > beyond 2 or 3 hops, but then again, that is not your > network anymore. Beyond that range it belongs to > the users there..., not where you are. > > de Wb4APR, Bob > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Next message: [aprssig] proximity detection
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
