TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgFri Jun 3 00:48:59 UTC 2005
- Previous message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Next message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yeah, and it really doesn't sound like anything revolutionary. I just thought the "since the Navy doesn't use radio" quote was funny. Fortunately the rest of the services have got it figured out. Scott N1VG > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org > [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan, Rick > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 4:09 PM > To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List' > Subject: RE: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us! > > Not much info at their web site: http://www.tplogic.com/ > > > Rick ka1udx > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Miller [mailto:scott at opentrac.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 16:07 > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us! > > >From Fox News today: > > The bulky "Big Eyes" binoculars have long been aboard > military ships so crew members can see points about five > miles away. But a company called Torrey Pines Logic has > designed an infrared attachment to allow soldiers looking > through them to communicate with each other, since the Navy > doesn't use radio. > > And here I was wondering why the PCSAT ground station > involved giant semaphore flags... > > Scott > N1VG > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Bruninga" <bruninga at usna.edu> > To: <jdw at eng.uah.edu>; <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> > Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:01 PM > Subject: Re: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us! > > > > >but between the increased load from growth of > >>APRS and the abuses both ignorant and malicious of large > values of n, > >>TRACEn-n support is going away, as is support for large values of n > >>for WIDEn-n. > > > > But under this New-N system, ALL paths using WIDEn-N will be fully > > traced. Thus we will have a network that can be analyzed > perfectly. > > No, it is harder to trace beyond 2 or 3 hops, but then > again, that is > > not your > > network anymore. Beyond that range it belongs to > > the users there..., not where you are. > > > > de Wb4APR, Bob > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprssig mailing list > > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Next message: TRACEx-x RE: [aprssig] God save us!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
