[aprssig] HF and the new n-N paradigm, mobile digis
Mark Saurman vo1one at gmail.comFri Jun 3 21:34:31 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS LAT/LONG standards
- Next message: [aprssig] HF and the new n-N paradigm, mobile digis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
What would be the recommended path for APRS mobile/portable stations on HF? I believe the old way was to use GATE, WIDE to get the position gated over to VHF, and then digipeated to hopefully reach an igate. Would the new way be GATE, WIDE1-1? Also, is there any convention in place for a standard alias to be used for a mobile digi? For example, let's say I'm biking along a trail in a valley and I've got a pockettracker or some other low powered device. I'm not going to be able to hit any digis, however the signal should be able to make it back to my car alright where I have a decent antenna and 50 watts capable of making it to a digi. I wouldn't want to set it to anything home based systems use as that would just create QRM. Another example would be a hamfest where the nearest digi might be too far to be able to pick up 1/4 watt transmitters. Thanks es 73, Mark VO1ONE
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS LAT/LONG standards
- Next message: [aprssig] HF and the new n-N paradigm, mobile digis
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
