[aprssig] CW stations and ui-view igate
Steve Dimse steve at dimse.comThu Jun 16 10:44:03 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] CW stations and ui-view igate
- Next message: [aprssig] CW stations and ui-view igate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jun 16, 2005, at 6:24 AM, AE5PL Lists wrote: > CW stations use an unverified login (see post in other thread > describing > these) which I would guess UI-View recognizes as non-ham and > refuses to > gate them to RF. > I do not know specifically about UI-V, but some other IGates will pass unverified packets when the call is specifically included in the list. Obviously using CW* in this situation would be a disaster, but specific local CW stations would not cause excessive QRM. Speaking only of US rules, this is not illegal. Under the Automatic message forwarding system rules, unless a verification is made, the first station to transmit a message on RF assumes responsibility for the content of the message. If it is a CW station, the risk to an IGate operators license is small, but still real. This is why the default behavior of the system is to exclude unverified packets. So just to fine tune your statement in the previous message, the verification does not PREVENT those packets from being IGated to RF, but rather allows the IGate operator to decide for him/herself whether to assume responsibility for those messages. Steve K4HG
- Previous message: [aprssig] CW stations and ui-view igate
- Next message: [aprssig] CW stations and ui-view igate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
