[aprssig] Packet routing, path specification.
scott at opentrac.org scott at opentrac.orgThu Jun 23 14:39:14 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet routing, path specification.
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet routing, path specification.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I suspect encouraging all these users of brain-dead TNCs that > send out $GPGGA sentences to switch to a tracker that can > produce MIC-E sentences would have a _much_ greater impact on > bandwidth utilization than eliminating messaging. Hmm, maybe I ought to offer a 'bounty' to get rid of those. Like maybe 50% off an OpenTracker if you promise to take your old, dumb tracker off the air. =] Think anyone would go for that? > Let's have a compressed weather packet, too, while we're at it. I'd make some comment about the merit of an entirely new, consistent, efficient 8-bit binary messaging protocol, but I haven't got my Nomex coveralls on yet.... =] Scott N1VG
- Previous message: [aprssig] Packet routing, path specification.
- Next message: [aprssig] Packet routing, path specification.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
