[aprssig] Pete's NSR idea
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Jun 24 15:53:21 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] UI-View IGATE status
- Next message: [aprssig] Pete's NSR idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> needhame1 at plateautel.net 06/24/05 9:38 AM >>> > Bob has succeeded in getting people in the "sticks" >to change their digis so they will only repeat WIDE2-2 >or less, Ah, but absolutely no where in anything I have ever written has that been what I said. 2-2 only applies to very dense or contiguous areas. I even made a MAP of them from hard data. What this demonstrates to you is that SYSOPS often do things that may not be the same that some users need in some areas. Hence my concern over making a network based on NSR where the users are 100% at the mercy of some digi owners. Well managed NSR networks can work very well. But many digis are operted by absentee owners and by nature cannot be as responsive to changing needs as the current system. I have even said that in this higest density area of Wash DC and baltimore that we should ALLOW W3-3, but only encourage 2-2 for routine operations. Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] UI-View IGATE status
- Next message: [aprssig] Pete's NSR idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
