[aprssig] APRS Message Idea
AE5PL Lists HamLists at ametx.comThu Mar 3 23:28:20 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I will reiterate my statement before: putting a store and forward message function which acts on ALL unanswered messages on APRS-IS would have disastrous effects. This is from a network standpoint, not even addressing the potential abuse brought up by others. AJ's first post was regarding a store and forward server which would function similar to the Sprouls' email server. It would require the sender to specifically request a message be stored for future delivery. While the merits of this idea can be (and have been) discussed adnauseam, it would not directly be problematic from an APRS-IS network standpoint. Of course, an abuse of such a server could cause burst messaging which would then be harmful, but that is another issue. It is very key to the stability of APRS-IS that only APRS packets be passed, unimpeded and unaltered. If one were to begin to store and forward all messages, this would be contrary to the APRS design and would render useless the real-time world-wide messaging capability of APRS-IS. You can play all you want with the APRS-IS stream going to you. The problem begins when you start sending unsolicited responses, etc., back into it. Firenet established a very localized stream where experimenters could work with injecting objects from different sources without affecting the whole of APRS-IS. This was doable because they were not dealing with messaging. Someone connecting to one of their servers with a standard client could see all of APRS-IS, be seen on APRS-IS, and see all of the Firenet objects yet those Firenet objects would not be seen on APRS-IS. Experimentation is fine. It is done all the time. After all, this is amateur radio. But like any on-the-air experimentation, one must consider the possible consequences of the experiment and act accordingly. As far as setting up a "test net", have at it. Nothing prevents you from testing on your own, disconnected server ;-) But just because you can make something work doesn't mean it should be put on APRS-IS. The Firenet group is a great example of understanding that. 73, Pete Loveall AE5PL mailto:pete at ae5pl.net > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Rich > Posted At: Thursday, March 03, 2005 4:59 PM > Subject: RE: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea > > Maybe an expirementers stream on APRS IS is needed ? > > Have a test net, for development and then migrate across to a real one
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
