[aprssig] alt input digipeater
Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf2 at aol.comFri Mar 4 03:14:31 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] alt input digipeater
- Next message: [aprssig] alt input digipeater
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
aprs at kd4rdb.com wrote: >if the main digi >squawks using 67hz, that you are in an area that has 144.99 alt input. I'd say >do this with the actual alt input transmitter, but it would TX so infrequently, >you could pass thru an area w/o ever hearing it. > > > The alt input, as envisioned in this scheme, wouldn't have a separate transmitter. It 's just a second receiver and TNC sharing the 144.39's transmitter. >By doing this, the people running no receive trackers such as tiny trak could >monitor 144.39 for 67hz and know that they could QSY to 144.99 with their tiny >trak rig... > > This would work for a TinyTrak connected to a transceiver, but it assumes the radio has PL <ON RECEIVE>. A lot of the junker-clunker hand-me-down older 2M rigs that get pressed into service as trackers may have PL encoders on transmit but most don't on receive. It won't work at all for a PocketTracker which has no receiver at all. The original concept of this alt freq scheme was to give the LOCALS with low-power trackers a fignting chance against out-of-town long-path QRM and high-power mobiles. It was not intended to support the itinerant passing through. I think the idea is that the locals would find out through other channels, such as beacons on 144.39, local clubs, or this list. Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf (at) aol.com Home Page: http://wa8lmf.com New/Updated "Rev G" APRS http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs Symbols Set for UI-View, UIpoint and APRSplus: NOTE NEW URL
- Previous message: [aprssig] alt input digipeater
- Next message: [aprssig] alt input digipeater
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
