[aprssig] MIC-E and APRS
Phillip B. Pacier ad6nh at arrl.netFri Mar 4 17:31:46 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] MIC-E and APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] MIC-E and APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Earl Needham wrote: > I get the feeling that, for this to happen, we'll have to go > from a point where APRS is a primary operation to a point where APRS > is simply an add-on that EVERYBODY does. I mean, right now, most of > us who run APRS have dedicated 2-meter rigs for that, a TNC, GPS, > etc. It's basically a second station in out house or vehicle. At > some point, we may or may not move to a spot where the PRIMARY station > does it all. I think the original plan for Mic-E was that 2-meter (or other) voice repeaters would be set to receive the APRS packet burst at the end of a voice transmission. For example, you would key up and talk to your buddy, and when you unkey, the Mic-E device sends the packet burst. I know the D7 can be set to do this. It sounds like an annoying courtesy tone, but it works if the repeater is set to receive the burst. From there, an interface could route the packet from the voice repeater to 144.39 and/or to the internet. If you can get past the annoying burst of noise, it is a very efficient way of beaconing. 73 Phil - AD6NH http://www.aprsca.net
- Previous message: [aprssig] MIC-E and APRS
- Next message: [aprssig] MIC-E and APRS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
