[aprssig] APRS Message Idea
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSat Mar 5 01:21:26 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Future APRS in every radio
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Kraus wrote: >> Get on a quiet channel and try UI-View, APRSDOS, APRS+, >> xastir side by side.... measure the length of time and >> number of packets ... to get the message through. Actually, in the absence of QRM on a quiet channel every system will workperfectly with instant deilvery, no collisions and no retries... >> Then get on 144.39 and do the same test. Yes, that is where the difference comes in. The decay algorithm is all about doing the retries efficiently *and* farily, but with channel stewardship in mind. Similarly, smart-acking also works to improve the odds in the presence of collisions... >>> ad6nh at arrl.net 3/4/05 6:20:36 PM >>> >I have done this very test, and I have found that [UIview] >works quite well. I guess I know how to use the program >in a way that others do not. It all depends on the channel. On a private QRM free channel everything works well. Also one can always get good "performance" by setting max rates and max hops for digi saturation from all directions with multiple copies and stepping on everyone else to get one's own messages through. But it kills the channel for everyone else.. Remember, without network stewardship, anyone can make settings to force their stuff through at the expense of everyone else. But I dont call that "good performance". Yes good for one person but bad for everyone else. That is why APRS was fundamentally designed around the decay algorithm. No one can abuse it, yet everyone gets almost instant retries (8 seconds) on new fresh data, but then falls off to share the channel almost as fast if the packet is not getting through... Everyone wins, and no one loses beacuse of other peoples "agressive" user settings. Its common gaming theory and human nature. Any system that *depends* on fair play to work, yet gives individuals the tools to improve their own odds at the expense of everyone else will always fail. Because everyone thinks, "well, ill just crank up my probabilities a little bit to beat the others" but everyone else does the same thing to compensate and the result is no one wins. See the movie "Its a beautiful mind" or whatever it was... Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Future APRS in every radio
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS Message Idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
