[aprssig] RE: IGate Abuse (Firenet Data)
Gregg Wonderly gregg at wonderly.orgMon Mar 7 15:13:35 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: IGate Abuse (Firenet Data)
- Next message: [aprssig] Go bag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
AE5PL Lists wrote: > In our area, CW data would cause a > lot more QRM than Firenet data. Fortunately, we don't have someone > gating it to RF even though they could. Another solution for some of these 'local' information flows is to put them on alternate frequencies. In particular, UHF has a lot of space for these kinds of custom data distributions. But, if you can't get the I-Gate operator to work with you about their VHF transmitions, it is proabably not going to be easy to get them to transmit on UHF... Gregg Wonderly W5GGW
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: IGate Abuse (Firenet Data)
- Next message: [aprssig] Go bag
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
