[aprssig] Additional IGates ?
steve at dimse.com
Fri Mar 18 15:11:07 CST 2005
On Mar 18, 2005, at 3:35 PM, William McKeehan wrote:
> It seems to me that more IGates would be a good thing and would not
> anything; especially listen-only IGates.
This comes up periodically. In general, the more ears the better, the
additional load on the APRS Internet System is minimal because of the
dup filtering. However, the concern is that every area should continue
to have functioning bidirectional IGates. Most people only notice that
an IGate is down when their data does not appear on findU. If the
bidirectional IGate serving an area goes offline, but there is a listen
only IGate nearby, then their data still appears on findU. Therefore,
any operator of a listen-only IGate needs to maintain constant
vigilance that the primary IGate is remaining up.
More information about the aprssig