[aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduMon Mar 28 13:30:56 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] New "whois" Server
- Next message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, I guess I am frustrated that with over 50 digis in 128 miles of Washington DC, and the WORST APRS network density on the planet, that now after 4 months of the proven efectiveness of the New n-N paradigm, only ONE DIGI has upgraded their TNC and only 7 have changed their existing parameters.. That's the basis of my lack of confidence in any plan that is based on new hardware... Bob >>> wa7nwp at jnos.org 3/27/05 3:05:02 PM >>> > >>> wa7nwp at jnos.org 3/24/05 1:33:40 PM >>> > >Here's my suggestion. > > > >Take Kantronics TNC's out of service as APRS digi's... > >Then, put UIDIGI or KISS Eproms (for digi-ned) in TNC-2 > >style TNC's (MFJ-1270, Tiny-2, etc) and use them for > >the APRS infrastructure. > > Along that same line, they can easily afford the change > by simply investing in the stock market and only "buy low" > and only"sell high". They would make more than > enough money to pay for it. > > Laugh... I'm not laughing. I'm crying... The UI-Digi software isn't near Digi-ned, but it's better then what we get with the 5+ year old Kantronics. It allows pre-emptive digipeating and dupe removal on all aliases, which we don't get with Kantronics. Best of all, while it's not open, at least the software is under development and supported. Kantronics is abandoned! What's the bank breaking expensive of this better system? Oh - $30..$50 or so on Ebay. I picked up a pile of 1270's at a hamfest not too long ago for something like $15 each. That compares to the $150+ (new) for the inferior Kantronics... I'm running out of patience for whining about the price of equipment like this. $100 or so is in the noise these days. There are plenty of folks ready and willing to put in the energy and make the investments necessary to build better systems. cp naysayers > /dev/null Jr High School kids these days spend hundreds ($300? $500?) on their graphics cards to better game performance. Wanna bet their going to be "impressed" by our blazing 1200 baud system? > It wont happen. Human nature.... Even now, only say > 10% of all digipeaters have even taken the effort to > change to the new n-N paradigm which could show > a factor of 2 to 6 improvement over what we have > and not cost a dime... but it hasnt happened. It will and is happening. It takes time. The proposals haven't been all that stable and I'm sure many folks are waiting for some time to make sure there aren't new changes. > THinking the whole network of 1000 digis is going > to change hardware is dreaming... I didn't say it was but I will. It should -- no question about that. Nothing wrong with dreaming - besides The network HAS TO continually change -- to grow and improve. * Tuning what we're doing is the first step. (hog counters) * Tweaking the configuration (new widen-n scheme) is important to get the best from the existing resources. * Critically important is to brainstorm, dream, plan and try new technologies which brings the next generation of the system. "Next generation" suggestions are far too often dismissed on this SIG... Thank goodness for the open and progressive NWAPRS. > Just a thought.. > > de Wb4APR Bill - WA7NWP _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] New "whois" Server
- Next message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
