[aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
Steve J. s.jones at rogers.comMon Mar 28 15:03:38 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Next message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 28, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Robert Bruninga wrote: > Yes, > I guess I am frustrated that with over 50 digis in 128 > miles of Washington DC, and the WORST APRS > network density on the planet, that now after 4 > months of the proven efectiveness of the New n-N > paradigm, only ONE DIGI has upgraded their TNC > and only 7 have changed their existing parameters.. > That's the basis of my lack of confidence in any plan > that is based on new hardware... Bob The same could be said of any plan which requires node ops to make multiple changes in their node configurations as things become "fine tuned". Just when they think things are finalized, another change is made and they have to update their configuration once again. -- Steve <s.jones at rogers.com>
- Previous message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Next message: [aprssig] Puget Sound packet hog counter
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
