[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
Curt, WE7U archer at eskimo.comThu Mar 31 23:05:33 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] While we're on the topic of Paths -- WIDE4-4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Stephen H. Smith wrote: > How about a path of "WIDE1-1, WIDE1-1" or "WIDE1-1, WIDE2-2" ?? > > > Set the alias of the former home "RELAY" digi to WIDE1-1 instead. If a > "dumb" home former-RELAY-type digi does the first digipeat, it marks > WIDE1-1 as used. > > Then the true WIDEn-N digi(s) get a shot at the second part of the > path. I assume that in the absence of a nearby home digi, a "real" > WIDEn-N would digi the first hop, then the WIDE2-2 part would cause two > more digipeats. > > The path is compatible with either first-hop-via-home-station, or > with all hops via n-N-only true wides and preserves exclusively > dupe-supressing WIDEn-N type paths. I could see going for that. It means the home stations are mostly silent until they are needed, s most people will wide2-2 in there instead. Just the mobiles/portables needing it will have wide1-1 in the first slot. This means that you can still get duplicate packets because of the home digi's, but the hilltop digi's will include it in their dupe-checking. Seems to work for what I need! -- Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer "Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown "Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U "The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Next message: [aprssig] While we're on the topic of Paths -- WIDE4-4
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
