[aprssig] While we're on the topic of Paths -- WIDE4-4
Chuck Kimball n0nhj at amsat.orgThu Mar 31 23:29:05 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Do any of the users in the "Vast expanses out west" know of any areas where WIDE4-4 is really needed or even wanted? I cringe every time I see that exception included in message about what paths to run. I've been looking at several of the western states and I can't find anywhere that path would provide any service. All of the digis I can find seem to hit an I gate within 2 hops. Some of the large open areas don't have digis, or Igates, so running a larger path buys you nothing. Here in Western Colorado, WIDE3-3 is too much as it is. Even though we have lots of territory between digis, we also have lots of high peaks and digis that see each other, compounding our problems. I'd really like to see us drop the recommendation of ever using WIDE4-4. (Or any path that creates 4 hops). WIDE4-4 from Western Colorado, or Eastern Utah can actually propagate your packet all the way to the mexican border which is a bit of overkill. I'd like hear from anyone who knows of a location where WIDE4-4 is really needed, otherwise we ought to drop any references to ever running that large of a path. The simpler we keep it for the average user, the more likely we are to be successful. We're still planning on cleaning up a lot of the digis in Western Colorado, but keep in mind it will be late June or early July before we can drive to some of our sites. Thanks Chuck n0nhj Glenwood Springs, CO
- Previous message: [aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
