[aprssig] PPersistance and Slottime settings.
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Nov 1 02:43:12 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Time Change (again)
- Next message: [aprssig] Johnny in Marine Corps Marathon on a MAP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> bruce.coates at sasktel.net 10/28/05 8:24 AM >>> >I'm just preparing to replace a failed UIDIGI >digipeater and am trying to figure out what >would be a suitable setting for Slotime and PPersistance. Normally APRS has always been recommended to have ALL digipeaters suppress all delays and to immediately seize the channel and digipeat immediately. The reason is that typically, eacch digi hears 4 or so other digis. If they respectuflly hold off to make sure that other digis have had a chance to digi first, then each packet guarnatees 5 time slots as each digi repeates in turn. And then 5x5 more time slots as each additional digi radiates outward. This is extremely inefficient. In APRS the next 4 digis are all supposed to key up at the same time., and then the next tier of 12 more digis will all key up at the same time. The result being only 2 total digipeating time slots are used up and the channel clears up very quickly. So I guess I think there should be no delays. it just slows the network down drastically. Bob, WB4APR Saskatoon, the home of the VE5BNC-3 IGate, has half a dozen highways that radiate out from it. The idea is to set digipeater timing so that it packet tend to travel towards the central digi. Here's how I think it works if two of my digipeaters hear the same signal from a station half way between them. If this station uses a path of WIDE2-2, my hope is to have the outlying digipeat it first, followed by the central digi where it would stop. What I'm trying to avoid is having the central one digipeat first and then every outlying digipeat the second hop. Here are the timing parameters that I'm looking at. Digi will use aggressive timing and will be more likely to be the first to digipeat. This would be used on outlying digipeaters. PPersistance = 255 SlotTime = 1 Digi will use more relaxed timing and will be less likely to be the first to digipeat. This would be used by the digi in the middle of town. PPersistance = 64 SlotTime = 10 First, am I right? Second, should I care? Third, is it worth trying to fiddle with the timing in the hope of optimizing things? 73, Bruce - VE5BNC _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
- Previous message: [aprssig] Time Change (again)
- Next message: [aprssig] Johnny in Marine Corps Marathon on a MAP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
