[aprssig] SOS Radio
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Nov 11 14:15:34 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: National Weather Services Duties Act (S. 786 )
- Next message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
By now you may be hearing about the concept of SOS Radio, where the public is encouraged to use channel 1 tone 0 for emergency calls to monitoring HAMS. We tried to get somethign like this going years ago. In our opinion, the number one sentence that should be included in ANY such announcement or solicitation to the public or in instructions on how to use it is something like this: "Unlike cell phones, radios share a common channel and must have callsigns inorder to distinguish who is saying what to whom. Callers must identify themselves with a unique callsign. We suggest your home address or your initials and digits of your home address. This allows efficient two-way communications on a shared channel, and the abilitiy for call-back when needed." Radio channel chatter between anonymous parties multipled thousands-fold will be useless without repeatable-identification. I was going to suggest they use their phone number, but that might give up too much privacy and could be terribly abused. Actualy for emergency use, I would think that FULL STREET ADDRESS might be the best callsign for this particular SOS application. Because in one phrase, it not only gives voice ID, but also location. Both of which are very important. de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] Re: National Weather Services Duties Act (S. 786 )
- Next message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
