[aprssig] SOS Radio
Rahn whiskey7doa at gmail.comFri Nov 11 14:31:11 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Next message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Are we talking about FRS/GMRS radios here? I am guessing so since CB's do not have tone capabilites... that I know of. Robert Bruninga wrote: >By now you may be hearing about the concept of >SOS Radio, where the public is encouraged to use >channel 1 tone 0 for emergency calls to monitoring >HAMS. We tried to get somethign like this going >years ago. In our opinion, the number one sentence >that should be included in ANY such announcement or >solicitation to the public or in instructions on how >to use it is something like this: > >"Unlike cell phones, radios share a common channel and >must have callsigns inorder to distinguish who is saying >what to whom. Callers must identify themselves with >a unique callsign. We suggest your home address or >your initials and digits of your home address. This allows >efficient two-way communications on a shared channel, >and the abilitiy for call-back when needed." > >Radio channel chatter between anonymous parties multipled >thousands-fold will be useless without repeatable-identification. >I was going to suggest they use their phone number, but >that might give up too much privacy and could be terribly >abused. Actualy for emergency use, I would think that >FULL STREET ADDRESS might be the best callsign for this >particular SOS application. Because in one phrase, it >not only gives voice ID, but also location. Both of which >are very important. > >de WB4APR, Bob > > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at lists.tapr.org >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > -- Rahn Abbott W7DOA 73
- Previous message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Next message: [aprssig] SOS Radio
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
