[aprssig] RE: timeslotting on HF ? was > 15. APRS trackers on 10m (Robert Bruninga)
Curt Mills archer at eskimo.comSun Nov 27 18:47:00 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: timeslotting on HF ? was > 15. APRS trackers on 10m (Robert Bruninga)
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: timeslotting on HF ? was > 15. APRS trackers on10m (Robert Bruninga)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Robert Bruninga wrote: > But, since a PIC is involved, I guess,... Why not? The > onboard PIC does know the callsign of the owner, so it > could then assign a slot based on an algorithm based on > the call (including SSID in the algorithm). Then in the > unlikely event that there was a conflict, the stations > affected could resolve it by changing one of their SSID's. Just switch the algorithm on alternate timeslots so that conflicts between callsigns using one algorithm would be very unlikely to be conflicts using the other algorithm. -- Curt, WE7U. archer at eskimo dot com http://www.eskimo.com/~archer Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math. - unknown Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates. - WE7U. The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] RE: timeslotting on HF ? was > 15. APRS trackers on 10m (Robert Bruninga)
- Next message: [aprssig] RE: timeslotting on HF ? was > 15. APRS trackers on10m (Robert Bruninga)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
