[aprssig] 10m & 1000 Hz shift
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduSun Nov 27 22:17:37 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] PCSAT MHeard in Dayton - Sunday 11/27
- Next message: [aprssig] 6 meter was:10m & 1000 Hz shift
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>>> jimlux at earthlink.net 11/27/05 4:32 PM >>> >Updated design goals for a 10m APRS tracker: > > > > 1) Xtal controlled 25W tracker on 28.187 MHz > > 2) Operates straight FSK at 1200 baud 1000 Hz shift >Differential propagation will likely cause numerous problems >with 1000 Hz shift on any sort of skywave 10m path... >Don't try to use a modulation designed for wireline comms >and its peculiarities on a skywave path. I think you maybe missed the beginning of this thread. That is that this is for LOCAL direct use, not for skywave. In fact, Skywave would make a mess out of everything. The only reason for going to 10m was because of the simplicity of a kit, easy use of CB antennas, lack of criticality, etc. But actually, since skywave would really mess it up big time, maybe we should consider going back to 6m which is where the thread really began. But then there are less economies of scale, since I dont think the Europeans have that band. So it would be a USA centric solution. But it doesnt matter, it is for LOCAL use, and no one can drive across the Atlantic anyway... >Trying to shoehorn it into some other format because >you happen to have legacy modems is probably >a bad plan. Agree completely if the goal was skywave. But it wasnt. The goal was a cheap kit transceiver on another band for LOCAL tracking to allow for uninterrupted other use of 2m from the same mobile without intereference. It only makes sense to use the same TNC/modem we already use. de WB4APR, Bob
- Previous message: [aprssig] PCSAT MHeard in Dayton - Sunday 11/27
- Next message: [aprssig] 6 meter was:10m & 1000 Hz shift
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
