[aprssig] Xastir install issues
Wes Johnston aprs at kd4rdb.comTue Nov 29 12:14:52 UTC 2005
- Previous message: [aprssig] Xastir install issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Xastir install issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Linux (well debian based linux) has the "apt-get" command.... installing xastir is as easy as going to the command prompt and typing: apt-get install xastir linux will download and install a stable version of xastir for you. It's really easier than windows. The only oddity about it is that you have to be a super user (admin). If you want to install the sources, then you aren't a newbie (hi hi), but that's still fairly easy thanks to CVS and sourceforge. Many of the stripped down versions of linux such as puppy which as I recall is 50megs total, do not have the GCC compiler built in. I have recently remastered the "hamshack hack" knoppix cd to include shapelibs of each county in South Carolina and it still fits on a CD with room to spare. Anyone wishing a copy, please contact me. Wes Dave Baxter wrote: > Hi... > > The problem I found, was that only sources were available for download, > no runable binaries, despite Windows being in the list of supported OS's > on the Source Forge site. Even then only in .tar or .gz formats. > Neither of those could be handled by either Puppy, Suse (or WinZip!) as > far as I could find. At least there was no association between those > file types and any application provided in the distro'. WinZip > recognised them, but croaked on checksum problems. > > Also, compiling and linking, in my mind needs access to a > compiler/linker?!? If you don't have one lying about, unlikely for a > newbie with a fresh install of Linux (whatever distro') you get nowhere. > If there is one "hidden" within Linux, it needs to advertise itself so > we can find it, or be associated with a make file, or whatever the > equivalent is. > > The one thing that the Windoze community has sorted very well, is the > automated install utilities. 99% of the time, the result works as the > programmer intended. > > Until the Linux community can get to that sort of state, making it > "newbie friendly" many will take a look, say "Neat", but go no further. > Puppy is trying to do something along the automated install with it's > .pup and .get schemes. But as yet, only a handful of people can make > such files that work, but they do work very well. > > The Linux community also need to tune up their distro's. Suse 9 on a P4 > 1800 with 256MEG of ram, and many Gig of fast hard disk, it ran about as > fast as an arthritic snail on a go slow, and that after some 15 minutes > to boot! For that one reason alone, I'd bin it... No online help was > available that I could access, via the net, phone or on the CD. > > Puppy run's fast, but there again the whole package fit's into RAM, so > it would, and does! But at the moment has limited support for non Puppy > sourced applications. The free FTP server is the only thing I use it > for at the moment. > > Xastir again looks good, and not only I would like to play with it, and > fully evaluate it. So come on the Xastir types, do what it says on the > side of the (Source Forge) tin, and make a Windows version we can > actually download, install and use, WITHOUT having to compile/link etc. > Start with one built for Win98. That should run on 98, 2000 and XP > without problems, covering the majority of Ham users I'd think. > > That is all... > > Dave G0WBX. > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Xastir install issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Xastir install issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
